Interview Guide Generator
Select International’s EZ Guide™ Interview Guide Generator is designed to enable organizations to conduct their own competency analysis and to build behavioral based interviewing guides for applicant screening, without being “consultant dependant.” Structured behavioral based interviewing has proven to be a valuable predictor of an applicant’s capabilities and potential. The web-based EZ Guide provides an essential hiring tool, which used today, better predicts a candidate’s job performance tomorrow.
Benefits
- Integrates completely with Select Interviewing
- On-line access allows for ease of facilitation
- Documents and creates reports for EEOC process
- Offers secure and customizable access levels
- Is inexpensive to implement and manage
Features
- Users have access to Select International’s research-proven library of competencies and questions, providing considerable value to those companies with no existing competency model.
- The easy-to-use guides are created through a simple step-by-step process, and involve “Job Content Experts” to verify the content.
- The competencies, questions and behavior anchors are fully customizable.
- The convenient on-line tool contains more than 75 competencies with synonyms that can be used for creation of interview guides. Each competency has 10 or more questions from which to choose, while a behaviorally anchored rating scale helps to increase rater reliability among multiple interviewers.
- A Tracking Report provides documentation of the guide-creation process.
- Security is addressed by allowing users at different levels access to guides at any location, while limiting who has permissions to create and/or alter the guides.


Which Golf Tournaments are the Best Tests of Player Ability?
This paper examines the concept of golf tournament validity. Applying psychometric testing theory to golf tournaments, it examines the tournament results from the entire 2004 PGA season. The study also measured the difficulty and discrimination of the tournaments, and explored the interaction between validity, difficulty, and discrimination.







